Many a Modernite believes that the future will be multicultural. That goal is in no way possible, or true. When cultures clash or come together, only one can survive. This truth is evident throughout history, and has never wavered.
The curriculum of a Modernite institution or organization, often proclaims "diversity" as a goal, and even a virtue. Can the people who believe in such things not see the absurdity of proclaiming variance in people and culture as a strength? How does that make sense? For example: A company has on staff, 10 Africans, 10 Anglos, and 10 Asians, and half are gay. Modernites would thus claim diversity makes them strong. What is this strength?
In what dodo brained mind does the makeup of different peoples indicate an organizations ability to produce, or be effective? By having different races of people of different orientations, and different creeds, what has been improved? The answer is nothing.
Nothing has been improved. You now have a lot of people who cannot relate to one another because they are so uniquely different. Diversity and multiculturalism are not strengths. In bringing people together, you eliminate what was unique. It is nothing to be praised or touted as the way of the future. That future will prove only to eliminate all cultures but the singular strongest one. It is only ever possible for one culture to flourish when brought together. This is literal text book natural selection.
Natural selection, evolution, Darwin. The science the left loves. If the left can't even subscribe to their own heroes, their own science. What do they have? The answer is nothing. The left doesn't have God. The left doesn't have families. The left doesn't even have true morals. The left is nothing more than a group of people that are pawns to emotions pulled like puppet strings by their media masters, and the further, the masters of the media.
Look at the ancient city of Babylon. Everybody spoke one language, and practiced one culture. Despite that the city's peoples were diverse and from many different cultures, there was only the singular culture. The culture of this city was so strong, that outsiders were forced to adapt to its practices and traditions -- its culture.
Look at the Ainu people of Japan. The Ainu were a people with their own culture that clashed with the Japanese. Of course, as is 100% verifiable, historically accurate, factual, and true, the Ainu culture was conquered and eliminated; its people were assimilated. Only one culture survives. However, the people still exist. There are about 200 thousand in Japan. So, you could say that the Japanese people are now more diverse because of the Ainu. However, I challenge you to identify which person is Ainu, and which person is Japanese in a crowd.
Assimilate, conquer, or die. Those are the only truths in this world. The only inevitable outcome of multiculturalism.
No comments:
Post a Comment