If you didn't know, Rammstein -- who has been on hiatus for some time -- just released a new music video titled, "Deutschland" that was immediately banned in Germany, and flagged on YouTube. The video has a Satanic air about it throughout the whole thing and depicts a singular black woman as the nation of Germany. It also shows Nazis and concentration camps; I assume it was censored for that reason.
I will not describe the video, as you can watch it for yourself. But, I will give you my take on it. To me, the video was depicting the wrongs Germany -- played by the black woman -- had committed, and utilized the black woman to depict the current wrong of forced diversity and multiculturalism. Satanism is depicted throughout the video, and the black woman is worshiped almost constantly. Later, the black woman gives birth to dogs, which I take to be a punch at the offspring of all those diversity imports that Merkel has forced upon Germany's people.
Another interesting fact is the banning itself. Germany is no doubt on its way to creating a Fourth Reich, as inevitably the extremist policies of importing alien cultures and people will bring about a new Nazism, with a Germanic national identity at its core. Censorship is the WORST thing that can be done to prevent extremism. From history, we can see that whenever a problem or controversy was ignored, disaster followed. Keep in mind that Merkel has extreme influence -- if not control -- within the EU, and not too long ago there were reports that Merkel and Germany has plans to create a EU Army -- Fourth Reich in disguise.
31 March 2019
29 March 2019
The Simplistic Truth of the Ten Commandments
Like many of those who grew up in Christians households, I was raised in the New Testament. I went to Sunday school -- should be Sabbath (Saturday) school -- I went to church, and I learned about and accepted Jesus. There is nothing wrong with any of that. In fact, I am grateful that I was brought up with at least that much instruction in the Truth. However, learning about Jesus and studying the New Testament alone, is not enough.
The reason it is not enough, is because Jesus' teachings were never meant to be the only thing studied, or taught. The Ten Commandments were supposed to be taught along with it. Yes, Jesus tells people how to live and behave but it is spread out along many chapters and pages. This is because the Ten Commandments -- God's Law -- was supposed to be a given. Unfortunately, many Christians see the word "Old Testament" and equate that with being outdated. It is not outdated. The "Old Testament" is still very much relevant, and the naming of the Testaments Old and New was done purposefully to mislead people from the Lord's Truth.
To live fully in God, one must accept Jesus into their hearts and follow the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments serve to simplify our lives. The reason there are so many fake Christians, is because many believe that they've accepted Jesus, so that means they are okay to do as they wish. They have secured their passage, so they go about life largely doing as they have always done. Living in sin, as without following the Ten Commandments, there is no simple instruction for how to live your life.
The problem with keeping faith only with Jesus -- the "New Testament" -- is that you then forsake God's part in the whole thing. God sent Jesus to die for our sins; to act as our sacrifice. By blood sin is committed, by blood sin is atoned. Jesus often re-directs praise towards himself to God. To follow God, you must then accept His Son, Jesus as your savior AND follow God's Ten Commandments.
Sure, you are saved by believing in Jesus alone, but by forsaking the Lord's Ten Commandments, which Jesus says to keep in Mathew 19:17, you are not doing all that you could do to walk with God. By not living life by the Ten Commandments, you even defy Jesus. Is that how you really wish to serve the Lord? As a fake Christian?
If you still disagree that Christians should follow both Jesus and the Ten Commandments, then I urge you to read up on the Ten Commandments for yourself. You will see how the Catholic church changed them. You will see how modern Christians forsake them. Then you can decide if you will follow both God and Jesus. As living with both is the true way to serve. I pray that the Beginning and the End shows you His Truth.
The reason it is not enough, is because Jesus' teachings were never meant to be the only thing studied, or taught. The Ten Commandments were supposed to be taught along with it. Yes, Jesus tells people how to live and behave but it is spread out along many chapters and pages. This is because the Ten Commandments -- God's Law -- was supposed to be a given. Unfortunately, many Christians see the word "Old Testament" and equate that with being outdated. It is not outdated. The "Old Testament" is still very much relevant, and the naming of the Testaments Old and New was done purposefully to mislead people from the Lord's Truth.
To live fully in God, one must accept Jesus into their hearts and follow the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments serve to simplify our lives. The reason there are so many fake Christians, is because many believe that they've accepted Jesus, so that means they are okay to do as they wish. They have secured their passage, so they go about life largely doing as they have always done. Living in sin, as without following the Ten Commandments, there is no simple instruction for how to live your life.
The problem with keeping faith only with Jesus -- the "New Testament" -- is that you then forsake God's part in the whole thing. God sent Jesus to die for our sins; to act as our sacrifice. By blood sin is committed, by blood sin is atoned. Jesus often re-directs praise towards himself to God. To follow God, you must then accept His Son, Jesus as your savior AND follow God's Ten Commandments.
Sure, you are saved by believing in Jesus alone, but by forsaking the Lord's Ten Commandments, which Jesus says to keep in Mathew 19:17, you are not doing all that you could do to walk with God. By not living life by the Ten Commandments, you even defy Jesus. Is that how you really wish to serve the Lord? As a fake Christian?
If you still disagree that Christians should follow both Jesus and the Ten Commandments, then I urge you to read up on the Ten Commandments for yourself. You will see how the Catholic church changed them. You will see how modern Christians forsake them. Then you can decide if you will follow both God and Jesus. As living with both is the true way to serve. I pray that the Beginning and the End shows you His Truth.
The Sins of Jews & Catholics
I was recently watching the video "the vicious effect of usury," on E. Michael Jones channel, on YouTube. I was perusing the comments when I saw one comment that really irked me. Here it is, I will omit the commenters name to reduce the likelihood of the the person being heckled.
As you can see, both Jews and Catholics are guilty of creating their own "divine" laws and idols. The Jews have turned their Talmud into their God and false idol -- Second Commandment. The Catholics have turned their church into their God and false idol -- again, the Second Commandment which they purposefully removed for that reason.
Examining both together, you can see that a lot of Catholics and Jews are actually Satanists hiding within the guise of their churches, religions, and false faiths. These bad Catholics, and bad Jews only serve themselves. The Catholics change God's laws in order to suit their whims. The changing of the Sabbath day is the prime example; nowhere did God tell man that Sunday (the first day of the week) is the new Sabbath day. The Jews excuse themselves from God's Law with their Talmud; nowhere did God say that man could make laws that overruled his own. Can you see the blasphemy of it all? Man is making his own laws which he claims overrule that of God's own. That is Satanism.
Since Creation, there has only been one day that God rested, and it shall not change. Here it is straight from Jesus' mouth: "Why do you ask me about what is good?" Jesus replied. "There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments"(Mathew 19:17 NIV). Jesus himself said to keep the Commandments -- PLURAL -- this means all of them. A common argument is that all, or most of the "Old Testament" -- really not a true name at all, but was purposefully done to mislead -- is abolished. That is simply not true. The only things that were "abolished" which is really refined, revised, or reformed, were the specifics of Jesus's words. That is all. If Jesus specifically stated that this is how something should be done, then it shall be so. Everything else from the "Old Testament" is still in effect.
Read this quote from above again, "The Sabbath is kept on the Christian tradition, except since God rose from the dead on Sunday, we transfer it to Sunday." Can you see now how man changes things to suit his own desires? What better way could Lucifer "the father of lies" best deceive the Lord's children than to convince man that the Sabbath day is really on Sunday because Jesus rose on that day. That is not logical. That is not Logos. The Sabbath day (Saturday) is the day of rest. Period. It was, is, and shall forever be on the same day as the seventh day that the Lord rested. The end.
Bonus argument: In that quote you can see how the commenter called Jesus, God. This is more Luciferian wizardry at work. They are not the same being. God is God. Jesus is Jesus. God sent His only begotten Son. From that, your God gifted human reasoning ability should already tell you that Jesus is a separate entity from God. That said, Jesus is still Holy. He is not to be worshiped though. Jesus did not even want mans' worship, as He always said his strength came from God. Jesus is to be looked at as our sacrifice, and revered for it. He is after all, the last sacrifice and the Messiah.
To the jew on the video (sorry didn't get your name): The Sabbath is kept on the Christian tradition, except since God rose from the dead on Sunday, we transfer it to Sunday. As well as the 10 Commandments are all kept (and in fact intensified) even by a stricter interpretation of them. This you will of course only see in the true Church which is the Catholic Church.The Catholics are guilty of worship to their church, and the change the Ten Commandments. The Jews are guilty of refusing Jesus, and making up their own "divine" laws through the Talmud. There are a plethora of bad Jews and bad Catholics in the US right now. Contrary to what the quote above says, the Catholics are guilty of changing the Ten Commandments: the removal of the Second Commandment, the Command to not worship false idols (Mary, statues of Jesus, saints, etc.); the Fourth Commandment, the Sabbath day which is Saturday, not Sunday; lastly the breakup of the Tenth Commandment into two in order to disguise the disappearance of the Second Commandment.
As you can see, both Jews and Catholics are guilty of creating their own "divine" laws and idols. The Jews have turned their Talmud into their God and false idol -- Second Commandment. The Catholics have turned their church into their God and false idol -- again, the Second Commandment which they purposefully removed for that reason.
Examining both together, you can see that a lot of Catholics and Jews are actually Satanists hiding within the guise of their churches, religions, and false faiths. These bad Catholics, and bad Jews only serve themselves. The Catholics change God's laws in order to suit their whims. The changing of the Sabbath day is the prime example; nowhere did God tell man that Sunday (the first day of the week) is the new Sabbath day. The Jews excuse themselves from God's Law with their Talmud; nowhere did God say that man could make laws that overruled his own. Can you see the blasphemy of it all? Man is making his own laws which he claims overrule that of God's own. That is Satanism.
Since Creation, there has only been one day that God rested, and it shall not change. Here it is straight from Jesus' mouth: "Why do you ask me about what is good?" Jesus replied. "There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments"(Mathew 19:17 NIV). Jesus himself said to keep the Commandments -- PLURAL -- this means all of them. A common argument is that all, or most of the "Old Testament" -- really not a true name at all, but was purposefully done to mislead -- is abolished. That is simply not true. The only things that were "abolished" which is really refined, revised, or reformed, were the specifics of Jesus's words. That is all. If Jesus specifically stated that this is how something should be done, then it shall be so. Everything else from the "Old Testament" is still in effect.
Read this quote from above again, "The Sabbath is kept on the Christian tradition, except since God rose from the dead on Sunday, we transfer it to Sunday." Can you see now how man changes things to suit his own desires? What better way could Lucifer "the father of lies" best deceive the Lord's children than to convince man that the Sabbath day is really on Sunday because Jesus rose on that day. That is not logical. That is not Logos. The Sabbath day (Saturday) is the day of rest. Period. It was, is, and shall forever be on the same day as the seventh day that the Lord rested. The end.
Bonus argument: In that quote you can see how the commenter called Jesus, God. This is more Luciferian wizardry at work. They are not the same being. God is God. Jesus is Jesus. God sent His only begotten Son. From that, your God gifted human reasoning ability should already tell you that Jesus is a separate entity from God. That said, Jesus is still Holy. He is not to be worshiped though. Jesus did not even want mans' worship, as He always said his strength came from God. Jesus is to be looked at as our sacrifice, and revered for it. He is after all, the last sacrifice and the Messiah.
28 March 2019
A Lesson on How to Shoot
Thanks to my time as an Infantryman in the US Army, I've been blessed with some knowledge about shooting. Yeah, that's right kiddo, you know Call of Duty? That's pretty much me... just kidding. Back on topic, I'm gonna break down basic shooting concepts as only a novelist knows how, in writing. I will be instructing you how to shoot as if you were laying prone (flat on the ground) with an AR-15 or other similar rifle shouldered, grip in hand, and trigger finger resting outside the trigger guard. Your finger should never touch the trigger until you are ready to fire/are preparing to fire. A lot of these concepts such as breathing, trigger squeeze, and sight picture can be applied to other firearms such as handguns.
First, let's go over your prone position. Your crotch should be pressed into the dirt, legs should be spread apart, and your toes should be pointed outwards -- toes basically pointing to the sides, but keep it comfortable. You want to have your legs mostly straightened out in this position to properly dispose the recoil from the rifle. Your torso shouldn't be canted, or twisted to either side too much. The key is to keep it comfortable while still maintaining position discipline.
If not using some sort of rifle rest, your left arm -- or right arm for those who are wrong handed -- should be gripping outwards towards the end of the hand guard to maximize the stability of the end of your barrel. If that is too uncomfortable, then feel free to move it in. If you are using some sort of rest, then put your free hand over the top of the hand guard, or grip from underneath, or any other comfortable position. Now to position your head.
Put your cheek to the stock, and press your nose against the charging handle, this is called the cheek weld -- nose to charging handle is if you are using an AR style firearm. The point of pressing your nose to the charging handle, is to ensure that you always have the same eye-to-sight (scope, red dot, etc.) picture. This means that if you were in a combat situation or whatever it is, you can readily find that same sight picture in order to ensure that what you're aiming at is what you will hit. For example, if you practice shooting with your nose to charging handle, or whatever cheek weld you use, then be sure to always use that, or you wont hit jack shit because your sight picture will be different.
Now your firing hand. Grip the rifle comfortably and high up on the grip, between the web of your pointer finger and thumb. There is no need to "white knuckle" the grip. Just keep it firm, but not so much that you shake the weapon by the pressure applied. Again, your finger should never touch the trigger until you are ready to fire/are preparing to fire. Before we actually get to shooting, an important part of the process is how you breath. When you shoot, it should be at the bottom of your exhale. For example, breath in (inhale), then breath out (exhale) all the way and fire at the bottom of your breath. Now, it's time for the trigger squeeze.
I emphasize squeeze because it is a squeeze. You should not be pulling, or jerking, or slapping, or hitting the trigger. Now, do this next part slowly. Rest the pad of your pointer finger on the trigger, and squeeze until the trigger "breaks," releasing the hammer, and firing the round. The point of the squeeze is so that the trigger break will surprise you. That way, you don't jerk the rifle. After the trigger has broke, keep your finger held in that squeezed position then slowly release until the trigger resets; but do not lift your finger from the trigger! If you do, you will be slapping your finger back down, and wasting precious time.
Next, squeeze that trigger during your exhale, firing it off at the bottom of that exhale. Again, the trigger break SHOULD surprise you. If you anticipate the trigger break, you will jerk the rifle. As you get used to it, that "surprise" is less surprising, and you then become a straight shooter.
Too easy. Remember, breathing, trigger squeeze, and sight picture can be applied to other firearms.
First, let's go over your prone position. Your crotch should be pressed into the dirt, legs should be spread apart, and your toes should be pointed outwards -- toes basically pointing to the sides, but keep it comfortable. You want to have your legs mostly straightened out in this position to properly dispose the recoil from the rifle. Your torso shouldn't be canted, or twisted to either side too much. The key is to keep it comfortable while still maintaining position discipline.
If not using some sort of rifle rest, your left arm -- or right arm for those who are wrong handed -- should be gripping outwards towards the end of the hand guard to maximize the stability of the end of your barrel. If that is too uncomfortable, then feel free to move it in. If you are using some sort of rest, then put your free hand over the top of the hand guard, or grip from underneath, or any other comfortable position. Now to position your head.
Put your cheek to the stock, and press your nose against the charging handle, this is called the cheek weld -- nose to charging handle is if you are using an AR style firearm. The point of pressing your nose to the charging handle, is to ensure that you always have the same eye-to-sight (scope, red dot, etc.) picture. This means that if you were in a combat situation or whatever it is, you can readily find that same sight picture in order to ensure that what you're aiming at is what you will hit. For example, if you practice shooting with your nose to charging handle, or whatever cheek weld you use, then be sure to always use that, or you wont hit jack shit because your sight picture will be different.
Now your firing hand. Grip the rifle comfortably and high up on the grip, between the web of your pointer finger and thumb. There is no need to "white knuckle" the grip. Just keep it firm, but not so much that you shake the weapon by the pressure applied. Again, your finger should never touch the trigger until you are ready to fire/are preparing to fire. Before we actually get to shooting, an important part of the process is how you breath. When you shoot, it should be at the bottom of your exhale. For example, breath in (inhale), then breath out (exhale) all the way and fire at the bottom of your breath. Now, it's time for the trigger squeeze.
I emphasize squeeze because it is a squeeze. You should not be pulling, or jerking, or slapping, or hitting the trigger. Now, do this next part slowly. Rest the pad of your pointer finger on the trigger, and squeeze until the trigger "breaks," releasing the hammer, and firing the round. The point of the squeeze is so that the trigger break will surprise you. That way, you don't jerk the rifle. After the trigger has broke, keep your finger held in that squeezed position then slowly release until the trigger resets; but do not lift your finger from the trigger! If you do, you will be slapping your finger back down, and wasting precious time.
Next, squeeze that trigger during your exhale, firing it off at the bottom of that exhale. Again, the trigger break SHOULD surprise you. If you anticipate the trigger break, you will jerk the rifle. As you get used to it, that "surprise" is less surprising, and you then become a straight shooter.
Too easy. Remember, breathing, trigger squeeze, and sight picture can be applied to other firearms.
27 March 2019
Criteria for Choosing an Obedient Wife
I find myself often thinking about how I will know if a woman is worthy of marrying. In our current Modernite degenerate society, it can be tough to find a good woman. However, that doesn't mean it is impossible. I'm going to list a couple values that I look for in a woman. Barring the first value, these are in no specific order, as almost no woman will already have these values. It will be up to you, the husband, to teach her the missing values.
Here are some considerations for you, as the husband. Do not abuse your authority over her. Keep her happy. Pay heed to her needs, but do not bend for her. Remember, a woman will undermine her own security and happiness if given the chance. Women are not leaders, that is the husband's job. A strong husband tells his wife "no." She will love you for your stern leadership.
Bonus wisdom: Never forget that God's punishments can last through generations, or that a woman who was once a Modernite, could easily betray you (Ex: Samson and his whore). The taint of either yours, or your wife's past deeds can poison your lineage. But, also keep in mind that God is merciful, like with the mercy for the whore Rahab, with the scarlet cord. So, be a better follower of God, NOW! That way, you can minimize the taint of sin on your lineage, and also maximize the Lord's favor in you.
- The only value that is absolutely necessary is that she believes in God. If a woman does not already believe in God, she is not worth marrying. She will poison your lineage if you do procreate with her at that stage. If she is open to being lead to God, then work on that before you commit, and definitely do not have children with her until she submits to God.
- A good wife must serve you, and submit to your authority. The man submits to God and his work, the woman submits to God and her husband. There are many Bible verses about a quarrelsome wife. If she does not heed your words, or constantly picks fights with you, then you need to call her out and put a stop to it -- that behavior is often called the shit test. If she does not change, then she is not wife material. When I look for a woman, I look towards the Bible story of Isaac's wife, Rebecca. Isaac sent his servant to the nation of his fathers' to find him a wife. The servant found Rebecca, and she proved her worthiness by her willingness to serve. Rebecca drew water for the servant and all his camels. Rebecca's servitude and obedience made her good wife material.
- A good wife often has a good upbringing. A home schooled woman will typically make for the best wife material. Women that are home schooled are usually well rounded, moral, intelligent, good home makers, and will often have a desire to home school their own children. Home schooling also keeps the influence from society at a minimum, which will also increase the odds that she is a virgin. A virgin woman is ideal. After that, you'll want to marry a woman who has slept with the least amount of men as possible. If she was once a self described feminist, lesbian, whore, bi-sexual, or of any other kind of Modernite sickness, then she is not worth the time. A case could be made for a VERY reformed woman, but most of the time, it's not worth the trouble.
- A good wife must be loyal. A loyal woman has your six. A loyal woman will not gossip about you, will not tell others your faults or weaknesses, will not put you down or otherwise discourage you, will not nag you, and will not challenge your decisions publicly. The loyal woman should sometimes question you privately, but if she betrays you in any of the above ways while dating, kick her to the curb.
Here are some considerations for you, as the husband. Do not abuse your authority over her. Keep her happy. Pay heed to her needs, but do not bend for her. Remember, a woman will undermine her own security and happiness if given the chance. Women are not leaders, that is the husband's job. A strong husband tells his wife "no." She will love you for your stern leadership.
Bonus wisdom: Never forget that God's punishments can last through generations, or that a woman who was once a Modernite, could easily betray you (Ex: Samson and his whore). The taint of either yours, or your wife's past deeds can poison your lineage. But, also keep in mind that God is merciful, like with the mercy for the whore Rahab, with the scarlet cord. So, be a better follower of God, NOW! That way, you can minimize the taint of sin on your lineage, and also maximize the Lord's favor in you.
26 March 2019
Coming Soon: The Federalists, the Government, and Taxes
If you know me personally, then you should know that I hate taxes. Well, at least as they are now. Even our government as we know it today is not how the Founders intended it.
I just started reading the first argument, and in the second paragraph the word truth was already mentioned. At that point I knew that I must purchase this for my library. After I do get a complete copy of the Federalist papers, I will study them thoroughly. After that, I will then break them down barney style, and explain exactly what the Founders intended for our government and tax laws. Until then, don't tread on me.
I just started reading the first argument, and in the second paragraph the word truth was already mentioned. At that point I knew that I must purchase this for my library. After I do get a complete copy of the Federalist papers, I will study them thoroughly. After that, I will then break them down barney style, and explain exactly what the Founders intended for our government and tax laws. Until then, don't tread on me.
The Roles of Men & Women
As I started up my favorite '50s era playlist, it occurred to me that nearly every song is about desiring a woman: seek comfort in them, seek fulfillment in them, "love (lust) at first sight," and overall making everything about women. What then dawned on me was that the "greatest generation" really only did one thing great, and that was to put the last piece of the slide that sloped us into a degenerate society, into place. Keep in mind, that no one time in history -- looking at you 1920's and the 19th amendment -- is to blame for the downfall of our society, rather it is men who are to blame for allowing it.
When Adam and Eve sinned, God said to them:
The reason women do as well as they do, is because women are designed to work within a structured environment. In time long past, the woman's husband used to structure that environment for her, thus she worked well within it, and desired her husband. Now, man has allowed the state to structure the environment: schools, institutions, universities, laboratories, the military. When there is a defined set of rules and regulations, the woman excels. When there is no governance, no rules, and things must be done on your own, the man excels.
It is in creating a society that the man can create structure designed for the good of all people. It is in giving women power within this structure that man signs its own execution. Given power, a woman will become tyrannical. This is because mans' rule over her IS tyrannical. The man has absolute power over the woman. However, the man can temper this rule and ensure her safety and happiness. The woman cannot, as all she knows is her structured way of life, and mans' absolute control. The woman doesn't understand the discipline and temperament that goes along with it.
This is the emotional control aspect. A man of God desires what is best for God. God wishes us to follow His teachings and be good. God has given this ruling to man. Man is supposed to enforce this rule over woman. We, as men, have not done this. Thus the woman has run rampant in her tyranny which has been allowed by man.
When a woman is left to her own devices, she cannot even secure her own safety, and will actively work to undermine her own positions and security. Just look at the absolute failure that is national leadership by women: German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern, The UK's PM Theresa May, the U.S.s own female leadership. Where a women rules, unrest, disaster, and chaos ensue.
Men. Take control from your women and rule over them. Women will love you for it. This is what the "alpha" does. This is what God has ordained, and this is what Lucifer wishes to pervert.
When Adam and Eve sinned, God said to them:
To the woman He said: "I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception; in pain you shall bring forth children; your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you."From this, we can establish the dominance of the man. Not only is mans' dominance ordained by God through His word, but also in mans' superior physical prowess, intelligence, and emotional control. Men are meant to lead, women are not. Because men have allowed women to vote, to be in positions of power, and to make decisions which are far, far beyond their capabilities, our society has degraded into a degenerate cesspool of filth and self pleasure. Women do not make good leaders. Period.
Then to Adam He said, "because you have heeded the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree of which I commanded you, saying , 'you shall not eat of it': Cursed is the ground for your sake; in toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life. Both thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you, and you shall eat the herb of the field. In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread till you return to the ground for out of it you were taken; for dust you are, and to dust you shall return." (Genesis 3:16-19)
The reason women do as well as they do, is because women are designed to work within a structured environment. In time long past, the woman's husband used to structure that environment for her, thus she worked well within it, and desired her husband. Now, man has allowed the state to structure the environment: schools, institutions, universities, laboratories, the military. When there is a defined set of rules and regulations, the woman excels. When there is no governance, no rules, and things must be done on your own, the man excels.
It is in creating a society that the man can create structure designed for the good of all people. It is in giving women power within this structure that man signs its own execution. Given power, a woman will become tyrannical. This is because mans' rule over her IS tyrannical. The man has absolute power over the woman. However, the man can temper this rule and ensure her safety and happiness. The woman cannot, as all she knows is her structured way of life, and mans' absolute control. The woman doesn't understand the discipline and temperament that goes along with it.
This is the emotional control aspect. A man of God desires what is best for God. God wishes us to follow His teachings and be good. God has given this ruling to man. Man is supposed to enforce this rule over woman. We, as men, have not done this. Thus the woman has run rampant in her tyranny which has been allowed by man.
When a woman is left to her own devices, she cannot even secure her own safety, and will actively work to undermine her own positions and security. Just look at the absolute failure that is national leadership by women: German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern, The UK's PM Theresa May, the U.S.s own female leadership. Where a women rules, unrest, disaster, and chaos ensue.
Men. Take control from your women and rule over them. Women will love you for it. This is what the "alpha" does. This is what God has ordained, and this is what Lucifer wishes to pervert.
25 March 2019
Child Raising: Schooling, Wisdom, and Teaching
The best thing we can do to foster the spirit of wholesome generations is to home school our children. If we love our children, we will home school them. That is the only way we can ensure our children's future success.
When we send our children off to school, whether private or public, we allow them to be influenced by "teachers," each with their own desires, and other children whom espouse the values learned in their own homes. We will not truly know our children if we send them away for schooling. This I can tell you from my own personal experience. My own parents don't have the slightest inkling of a clue as to who I am, and I'm sure many of you can relate to that.
To send our children away for "learning" is to sabotage our own lineage. Ever since the early beginnings of the 1900s, public schooling -- the will, and intentions of sick people -- began to take root. To desire the best for one's children, who better to teach them, than the children's own parents?
A parent's duty is to teach their children the things which they've learned through mistakes, so that our own children can avoid the errors we made, make their own errors, then further improve upon our teachings in their own children.
Here is a list of how we can better raise our children.
In all these things, we should show, and instruct our children in how these principles are implemented. I recently saw a quote along the lines of, "teach your children, so that you may spoil your grandchildren."
I pray that we can all raise a wholesome family. God bless you all.
When we send our children off to school, whether private or public, we allow them to be influenced by "teachers," each with their own desires, and other children whom espouse the values learned in their own homes. We will not truly know our children if we send them away for schooling. This I can tell you from my own personal experience. My own parents don't have the slightest inkling of a clue as to who I am, and I'm sure many of you can relate to that.
To send our children away for "learning" is to sabotage our own lineage. Ever since the early beginnings of the 1900s, public schooling -- the will, and intentions of sick people -- began to take root. To desire the best for one's children, who better to teach them, than the children's own parents?
A parent's duty is to teach their children the things which they've learned through mistakes, so that our own children can avoid the errors we made, make their own errors, then further improve upon our teachings in their own children.
Here is a list of how we can better raise our children.
- First, we must teach our children the Truth -- to worship the Lord and acknowledge Jesus.
- Second, we must teach our children to live by the Ten Commandments.
- Third, we must teach our children how to study the Bible.
- Fourth, we must teach our children to use their God given reasoning abilities, and to be skeptical of Earthly knowledge.
- Fifth, we must teach our children to follow their passions, but to temper them with wisdom, and discipline.
- Sixth, we must teach our children to be productive.
- Seventh, if we do all those things, everything else will fall into place.
In all these things, we should show, and instruct our children in how these principles are implemented. I recently saw a quote along the lines of, "teach your children, so that you may spoil your grandchildren."
I pray that we can all raise a wholesome family. God bless you all.
Mueller Report Changes Nothing; The "Anti-Conspiracy Left" Embraces Conspiracy
Do not be deceived by this minor success. Anybody with a fully functioning brain already knew that Trump was not involved with the Russians. Simply by the DNC's paid Steele "dossier," any rational person should have had all the information they needed to conclude that the whole thing was a conspiracy. The entire report was based on the falsified Steele "dossier," which was not even exchanged in person. It was even called a "dossier" to make it seem more credible than it was -- it was never credible to begin with.
The only accomplishments that this end to the conspiracy brings, is to further reduce the people's trust in the mainstream media. However, it will still be a while yet, until the fall of the deep state and collapse of the nation begins. Make no mistake, the state -- and the left -- will double-down. They always do.
One thing regarding Trump has remained true throughout all of his Presidency. There are people who absolutely hate him. Those people will do anything in their power to tarnish Trump, and his supporters. There are the followers, which are the average leftists, and there are the conspirators, which is the deep state, the bad Jews, the bad Catholics, and the Satanists.
The only accomplishments that this end to the conspiracy brings, is to further reduce the people's trust in the mainstream media. However, it will still be a while yet, until the fall of the deep state and collapse of the nation begins. Make no mistake, the state -- and the left -- will double-down. They always do.
One thing regarding Trump has remained true throughout all of his Presidency. There are people who absolutely hate him. Those people will do anything in their power to tarnish Trump, and his supporters. There are the followers, which are the average leftists, and there are the conspirators, which is the deep state, the bad Jews, the bad Catholics, and the Satanists.
Failure, Confrontation, and Arguments
Perhaps you've found yourself wondering how to stand up for yourself in an argument without doing it in a way that is against the teachings of the Bible. I've pondered this myself, and what I've concluded is that God has given man discretionary reasoning abilities.
Discretionary reason could be called the "gray area," or the topics that were not specifically covered in the Bible. For example, masturbation and porn are never explicitly mentioned in the Bible but we still find ourselves feeling guilty afterwords. God has left it up to the reasoning abilities of which He has blessed us with to determine how to go about our discretion.
My favorite Bible verse in terms of the discretionary argument is 1 John 3:18, "Dear children, let us not love with words or speech but with actions and in truth." So, if you find yourself arguing with another person, don't worry about offending them. The truth must be said. Sometimes, you've got to be an "asshole" -- as women often call men; a conversation for another time -- to get things done. This doesn't mean that you go out of your way to insult someone. But, if they challenge you, or try to debate you, then it is your discretion to respond in a way that seems fitting.
Personally, I'm a ruthless debater. If I know that someone has no idea what they are talking about, or they are accusing me instead of inquiring, I shut them down by changing the conversation, or walking away. There is no point in listening to a person discuss matters they know nothing about. If a person starts to accuse you of things which are not true, the conversation is especially not worth your time. Never respond to accusation with anything more than a simple denial. Do not defend yourself against false accusations. Just end the conversation. Nothing more than that will change anything, much like making public apologies for something said that was "offensive."
Ultimately, we are not perfect, so simply try your best. Don't punish yourself too much for mistakes and failures. Simply examine what went wrong, and move on. Don't take a comments section too seriously either. Some people simply enjoy hurling abuses. Utilize the block function.
Happy debating!
Discretionary reason could be called the "gray area," or the topics that were not specifically covered in the Bible. For example, masturbation and porn are never explicitly mentioned in the Bible but we still find ourselves feeling guilty afterwords. God has left it up to the reasoning abilities of which He has blessed us with to determine how to go about our discretion.
My favorite Bible verse in terms of the discretionary argument is 1 John 3:18, "Dear children, let us not love with words or speech but with actions and in truth." So, if you find yourself arguing with another person, don't worry about offending them. The truth must be said. Sometimes, you've got to be an "asshole" -- as women often call men; a conversation for another time -- to get things done. This doesn't mean that you go out of your way to insult someone. But, if they challenge you, or try to debate you, then it is your discretion to respond in a way that seems fitting.
Personally, I'm a ruthless debater. If I know that someone has no idea what they are talking about, or they are accusing me instead of inquiring, I shut them down by changing the conversation, or walking away. There is no point in listening to a person discuss matters they know nothing about. If a person starts to accuse you of things which are not true, the conversation is especially not worth your time. Never respond to accusation with anything more than a simple denial. Do not defend yourself against false accusations. Just end the conversation. Nothing more than that will change anything, much like making public apologies for something said that was "offensive."
Ultimately, we are not perfect, so simply try your best. Don't punish yourself too much for mistakes and failures. Simply examine what went wrong, and move on. Don't take a comments section too seriously either. Some people simply enjoy hurling abuses. Utilize the block function.
Happy debating!
23 March 2019
The Dangers of Religion, the Truth of Faith
Faith - to believe, follow, live, and espouse the teachings of the Bible, and use your God given reasoning abilities to decipher and implement the Truth within both the Old and New Testament. To live free from the chains of religion, and the men who would corrupt God's words.
Religion - to believe, follow, and live the teachings of a set doctrine created by men which requires blind adherence to a list of rules that are often claimed to have come as direction from God (false prophets).
I am going to discuss different religions. Namely: Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Modernism, and Satanism. None of this is "conspiracy theory," it is simply what I have ascertained through my own reasoning ability.
The problem with all these different Christian denominations, is that it inevitably creates strife between individuals who basically believe the same thing. One of the greatest denominations that is guilty of creating strife, is the Catholic church. There are many good people in the Church, but leaders of Catholicism have been corrupted by Satan. The first, and most prominent evidence for this, was the changing of the Ten Commandments. Namely, the Fourth and Second Commandment.
The change of the Fourth was the change of the day of worship which is the Sabbath day, from Saturday, to Sunday. This was done during the Roman Catholic period around the time of Constantine. The purpose for this was to deceive people by having them come to church and worship on Sunday. This would effectively create a massive amount of fake Christians who believed that they only had to worship on Sunday the (false) Sabbath, when in actuality the most important day of worship is Saturday, the true Sabbath. This fact would then be commonplace to overlook.
The Catholic church also eliminated the Second Commandment, which God commanded:
Christians will serve both sides in the end times. A lot of Christians are really just Modernites.
Religion - to believe, follow, and live the teachings of a set doctrine created by men which requires blind adherence to a list of rules that are often claimed to have come as direction from God (false prophets).
I am going to discuss different religions. Namely: Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Modernism, and Satanism. None of this is "conspiracy theory," it is simply what I have ascertained through my own reasoning ability.
Christianity
As the religion that is most varied, and close to the truth. Christianity, for a long time, has been the single most persecuted religion on the planet. There are simply way too many forms of Christianity -- this is by design -- which has allowed for the rules of man to influence truth in a negative way. I'm sure many can relate to the problem that is "fake Christianity." These are the people that constantly espouse their adherence to Jesus doctrine, go to church on Sunday -- the false Sabbath day -- and all the while live their private lives as a Modernite. Fake Christians do not have faith, they have religion, and do not follow the teachings and values taught by God, or Jesus.The problem with all these different Christian denominations, is that it inevitably creates strife between individuals who basically believe the same thing. One of the greatest denominations that is guilty of creating strife, is the Catholic church. There are many good people in the Church, but leaders of Catholicism have been corrupted by Satan. The first, and most prominent evidence for this, was the changing of the Ten Commandments. Namely, the Fourth and Second Commandment.
The change of the Fourth was the change of the day of worship which is the Sabbath day, from Saturday, to Sunday. This was done during the Roman Catholic period around the time of Constantine. The purpose for this was to deceive people by having them come to church and worship on Sunday. This would effectively create a massive amount of fake Christians who believed that they only had to worship on Sunday the (false) Sabbath, when in actuality the most important day of worship is Saturday, the true Sabbath. This fact would then be commonplace to overlook.
The Catholic church also eliminated the Second Commandment, which God commanded:
You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My Commandments.From this commandment alone, you can see the sin of many churches, especially the Catholic church, when they blatantly use objects, statues, and other likenesses to worship. There is nothing wrong with keeping a cross, a statue of Mary, or image of Jesus, so long as you are not using them to worship, or look to those images as holy things.
Christians will serve both sides in the end times. A lot of Christians are really just Modernites.
Judaism
This is a difficult religion for Gentiles (non-Jews) to comprehend. If you are a Gentile, that is anybody who is not a direct descendant of Israel, then you simply cannot be a Jew. Conversions will not make you a Jew. The Israeli government will not allow you to live there simply because you follow Judaism. You must prove it with blood.
There are many problems that the world is facing because of "Jews." Like all religions, there are good followers, and bad followers. Unfortunately, many Jews outside of Israel are bad Jews. Typically, they are Satanist-Liberals who seek to undermine their host nations. This is why Jews own the banks, the porn industry, the media companies, and even social media. These "Jews" are actually Satanists that do not follow God as he wishes for Jews to follow Him.
The entire Satanist-Judaist philosophy can be summed up as, "we Jews are the Superior race, and thus we will subvert all others." There is also the theory that the fake Jews only call themselves Jewish to bring people to hate Jews. An example of a very bad Jew, is Chuck Schumer. One example of his bad Jewry is his support of abortion in the U.S. but not for Israel. I will not go into more detail, as Owen Benjamin, and Vox Day talk about it often.
I'm not sure what Jews will do during the end times. I like to think the nations itself will oppose, but I cannot even begin to place a number as to how many.
Islam
The dangers of Islam should already be extremely apparent to most people. This "religion," which is really a political, societal, and cultural doctrine that requires absolute submission and zero use of ones own ability to reason, is without a doubt the worst so called religion on the planet. This doesn't mean that all its followers are bad. But, of all religions I don't doubt that this ranks in the top 3 for being dangerous.
Simply by looking at its foundations by the "prophet" Muhammad, it is clear that he was not a follower of God. This doesn't mean that Islam cannot be reformed, or that some reformations have not already taken place. But, why anybody who can reason would follow it, is beyond me. My time in the Army, and stories told to me by the men who deployed to the Middle East, has taught me enough of Islam to be extremely wary of it.
The only things Islam got right, is its zealousness for God, and some of its treatment of women. But overall, most Islamist's are simply brainwashed, and prone to violence. I actually think that Islamist's might oppose Satan in the end times.
Modernism
This is a religion of self worship. Modernists can be summed up as those people who are Atheist, karma worshipers, zodiac worshipers, universe worshipers, spirit worshipers, material worshipers, or those that just don't think about it. The common Modernist is a liberal. Someone who lives in a big city, uses apple products, believes heavily in man-made climate change, is pro-illegal immigrant, an SJW, listens to NPR, etc., you get the picture. These people suck. They don't really stand for anything, and their claims of "love wins," are nothing but words made hollow, devoid of meaning.
Modernists constantly claim virtue, morality, and love. None of those things have any meaning outside of God; and a modernist is very much outside of God. The modernist has brought you such lovely tolerance and acceptance of things such as: hate for the U.S., open borders, self-hate, transgenderism, promotion of gay behavior, hate of white peoples, hate of men, pedophilia, the destruction of marriage, race instability and conflict, abortion, conflict between men and women, and the overall degradation of true morality.
These people, although not often self defined as Satanists, are Satanists. To be a Satanist in action, all one needs to do is not worship God. Instead, one worships the Earth, or themselves, or simply doesn't think about it. Modernists are extremely weak people who generally stand for nothing more than what their base urges tell them to do. Modernists are also very susceptible to manipulation. Unfortunately, Modernists make up the majority of the U.S. population, so that makes them VERY dangerous. As currently, the vote still matters.
The common Modernist will be the downfall of nations because they stand opposed to truth. Easily manipulated, weak of courage, and true morality, the Modernists will be the soldiers for Luciferian armies in the end times.
Satanism
These are the people that actively plot and work to undermine God's authority, justice, and goodness. Although very close to Modernists, the Satanist is a self described worshiper of Satan (either publicly or privately) and actively work to pervert what God made. These people are sick. These are the spirit cookers, the bad Christians, the bad Jews, the church of Satan, many American politicians, celebrities and many other elites, and big time abortionists -- which is sacrifice to old demons like Moloch.
Satanists are everywhere, however they are few in number. The most dangerous Satanists are those that do not publicly proclaim their elegance to Lucifer, but instead pretend to be something else -- like the bad Christians, and Jews.
Satanists have their hands in all things that are made by man. This is what makes organized religion so dangerous. The Luciferians will try their hardest to infiltrate and subvert by any means necessary. The only way to prepare and counteract their attempts is to study the Bible, follow God's laws, and follow the teachings of Christ. In doing those things, you will be able to best detect a Satanist's subversion.
Satanists win positions of authority will be the officers of Luciferian armies in the end times.
22 March 2019
Tips for the Incoming Collapse
In case you didn't know, many people are predicting that the U.S., if not the whole world, will be facing a massive collapse within 30 years. This collapse could stem from the market, immigration, war, or government -- which is my theory, and is related to End Times. There are many people who offer different views on what the collapse will be. Vox Day, Stefan Molyneux, Owen Benjamin, etc. But one thing remains extremely similar, and that is the time frame. Most only vary by a few years.
My #1 tip to prepare for what many people, including myself, are predicting to be the collapse of the U.S. as we know it, is to get God. You need to study the Bible, get right with your family, and make friends and contacts with people of a similar mindset. If you serve the Lord, He will not allow you to fail. There will no doubt be hardships, but those hardships are placed in your life to push you in the direction that God wants you to be.
My #2 tip is to get off grid ready. What I mean by "off grid ready" is just as it sounds. Get yourself in the location and position to be able to survive and thrive while off grid when the SHTF. This means you need to get out of the cities, and get yourself a piece of land that will allow you to be able to farm and keep animals. Along with that, you need a way to thrive. To do that, you will need a wife, children, and other good company.
My #3 tip is to get armed, and get trained. To defend all those things which you hold dear, you must know how to kill and how to heal. Don't be like, "oh I could never kill" like some whiny child. Since Cain killed Able there has been killing. People will try to kill you if you oppose Satan. But do not fret! Learn how to use firearms, and get some knowledge on how to stop bleeding and other basic wounds.
My #4 tip figure out what it is God has gifted you with. What I mean by this is to embrace your natural abilities, and passions. This could be carpentry, metalwork, writing, speaking, thinking, shooting, cooking, what ever it is, figure out how to make that work. You may not be inclined to start your own farm, or commune or whatever, but if you can get to know people who are good with those things, I'm sure they could always use a cook, metalworker, etc.
My #5 tip is to get away from government. That means money, programs, "guarantees," grocery stores, electricity, vehicles, social media -- use only to get the word out/make connections -- get away from everything. This doesn't mean to become a shut in, or eccentric woodsman living of grid in a run down shack. Be smart about it.
My #1 tip to prepare for what many people, including myself, are predicting to be the collapse of the U.S. as we know it, is to get God. You need to study the Bible, get right with your family, and make friends and contacts with people of a similar mindset. If you serve the Lord, He will not allow you to fail. There will no doubt be hardships, but those hardships are placed in your life to push you in the direction that God wants you to be.
My #2 tip is to get off grid ready. What I mean by "off grid ready" is just as it sounds. Get yourself in the location and position to be able to survive and thrive while off grid when the SHTF. This means you need to get out of the cities, and get yourself a piece of land that will allow you to be able to farm and keep animals. Along with that, you need a way to thrive. To do that, you will need a wife, children, and other good company.
My #3 tip is to get armed, and get trained. To defend all those things which you hold dear, you must know how to kill and how to heal. Don't be like, "oh I could never kill" like some whiny child. Since Cain killed Able there has been killing. People will try to kill you if you oppose Satan. But do not fret! Learn how to use firearms, and get some knowledge on how to stop bleeding and other basic wounds.
My #4 tip figure out what it is God has gifted you with. What I mean by this is to embrace your natural abilities, and passions. This could be carpentry, metalwork, writing, speaking, thinking, shooting, cooking, what ever it is, figure out how to make that work. You may not be inclined to start your own farm, or commune or whatever, but if you can get to know people who are good with those things, I'm sure they could always use a cook, metalworker, etc.
My #5 tip is to get away from government. That means money, programs, "guarantees," grocery stores, electricity, vehicles, social media -- use only to get the word out/make connections -- get away from everything. This doesn't mean to become a shut in, or eccentric woodsman living of grid in a run down shack. Be smart about it.
21 March 2019
My Recommended Truth Tellers and Who to Avoid
Here is a quick list of who I listen to, and what I study.
Avoid Joe Rogan, and Jordan Peterson. They may be good places to start, but overall you will not be doing yourself any favors by sticking with them. Ultimately they both keep people thinking in circles. Their so called answers never really go anywhere, and they have many topics that are "off limits."
Peterson offered me some value when I was first getting started, but later I discovered that he is a charlatan. His ideas of pure individualism pull young men away from God, family, and nation. To sum him up, much like a Modernite, he espouses values that have zero meaning if not applied through God.
Joe Rogan is controlled opposition. This meaning that the "powers that be" keep him on the pay roll to intentionally misguide and pervert the truth. People cannot easily detect this because Rogan is allowed to use juuust enough of the truth to keep people mesmerized and unaware of the subversion. He never truly questions the root of things.
Keep in mind, that if you are just beggining to seek out Truth, then a quick foray into Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan may be benificial. Just be aware that in the end, the snake oil salesman wants your money.
Edit: I'm adding two more truth tellers to my list Gavin McInnes, and E. Michael Jones.
- Bible - the Truth
- No Agenda Podcast - the only 100% donation funded podcast, media deconstruction
- Vox Day - intellectual, eloquently speaks the truth
- Owen Benjamin - comedian that got out of Hollywood, brutally speaks the truth
- Stefan Molyneux - philosopher, eloquently speaks the truth
Avoid Joe Rogan, and Jordan Peterson. They may be good places to start, but overall you will not be doing yourself any favors by sticking with them. Ultimately they both keep people thinking in circles. Their so called answers never really go anywhere, and they have many topics that are "off limits."
Peterson offered me some value when I was first getting started, but later I discovered that he is a charlatan. His ideas of pure individualism pull young men away from God, family, and nation. To sum him up, much like a Modernite, he espouses values that have zero meaning if not applied through God.
Joe Rogan is controlled opposition. This meaning that the "powers that be" keep him on the pay roll to intentionally misguide and pervert the truth. People cannot easily detect this because Rogan is allowed to use juuust enough of the truth to keep people mesmerized and unaware of the subversion. He never truly questions the root of things.
Keep in mind, that if you are just beggining to seek out Truth, then a quick foray into Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan may be benificial. Just be aware that in the end, the snake oil salesman wants your money.
Edit: I'm adding two more truth tellers to my list Gavin McInnes, and E. Michael Jones.
20 March 2019
A Crash Course in the Truth
I will do my best to explain what the idea of the truth is in terms that are simple, and easy to understand. I will beak this explanation down into three different major categories, and their one major condition. Some of these categories will overlap. Keep in mind that to really know the truth, you must seek it out. Nobody can just tell you exactly what it is. This is mostly written for men, but women can find some truth as well.
These categories, in order, are:
This is because sin requires blood. By blood sin is performed, and by blood sin is atoned. "The wages of sin is death." That meaning in plain English: the payment for sin IS death - in other words, you purchase forgiveness with sinless blood as currency. This is the reason for all those sacrifices in the Old Testament, and the final sacrifice in the New Testament. God requires that we pay for our sins with the blood of pure (sinless) living beings -- people sacrificed by people do not count, as that sacrifice would be murder, and "innocent" children are born with the original sin through the fathers semen and the mothers egg, thus they are not pure. This is why God sent the ultimate sacrifice. That being Jesus, who was immaculately conceived and was a pure (sinless) man.
But what of the woman's sin? Did Mary not taint Jesus? Women are also born with original sin in their blood. The reason Jesus was pure, despite being born of a sinful woman, was because Mary had an immaculate conception, i.e. she did not have intercourse, and her own egg was not used. God simply used her virgin body to nurture the baby Jesus to life. Thus Jesus was grown in the womb of a sinful woman and provided nutrients through the Lords sinless foods - of Earths creations, only man & woman have sin. The curious may wonder, "well couldn't the womb contaminate Jesus?" No. No blood, nor tissue, nor any sorts of sin carrying DNA are passed from mother to child (it can be passed from child to mother) thus Jesus avoided mans original sin, and was born pure - and remember, Mary's egg was not used, nor was a man's semen. So, there was no DNA transfer in that way either. Besides, God created the entire universe and all its contents. Is it not at least possible that God could have prevented Jesus from being tainted while in the womb?
If you desire to know the truth, then you MUST study the Bible. End of story. If you did not grow up learning about Jesus, then start with the New Testament. If you did, then feel free to start with the Old Testament.
When a nation forgoes its own families, everything crumbles. This is the reason that the media is pushing for American families to not have children, and instead to work. With excuses such as: "you can't afford it; you're not ready yet; look how much money you could save; think of the Earth; you're contributing to overpopulation." All the while, our government brings in incompatible foreigners from countries that have more than four times the population of the U.S.. This is done to reduce the population of people with faith in God.
For thousands of years, mankind formed families, and had children. People with a hundred times less than what we have now, yet they still had children. People in poor nations - yes, like the one's you see on a t.v. commercial, think about for two seconds, then switch to the E! channel or some other Modernite distraction - are still having children despite extreme hardship. Are you really going to sit there and say that you can't have children because of... reasons? Get real.
You can have children if you really want to. A family, and especially children, will motivate you even further. You will work harder than you ever have, and you will be happier than you ever have - so long as you remain loyal to your family, and loyal to your faith in God.
Hopefully, now you can see the reasons for why some nations and people try to convince others to not start families, and not have children. Those people, organizations, institutions, and governments are satanists. Satanists wish to defy God in all things, and have loyalty only to themselves and their sinful desires. They may not know what it is they do, but so long as a person does not follow God, they are carrying out the will of Satan. Satan is the root of all evil.
The state as we know it is under control by satanists. This is the reason that the state is trying to eliminate God from all things. Satanists wish to take your freedom. A person who still has great faith in the U.S. might say, "well America is still free." And it is, for now. But, everyday that freedom is encroached. Just look at the insanity that is social media, and media censorship. Censorship under the guise of safety is a path to destruction. The first and second amendment are also attacked daily, and legislatures' are constantly trying to find ways to limit both. Eventually, the complete surrender of both will happen.
The state wants people to believe that freedom of choice is good. It can be. But, absolute freedom IS satanism. Worship of the self, worship of technology, worship of money, do whatever feels good, have sex with who you want, perform sodomy, don't have a family, get that abortion; all those things are satanism. Also, absolute freedom of choice will never be permitted. Not by God, and not by Satan, or those who serve Satan. However, Satan and his ilk will try to convince you that they do allow for absolute freedom - they don't.
To be a satanist, one does not need to join an official satanist cult/religion. All one needs to do is worship false idols, and have loyalty to mankind's works. Freedom is good. However, absolute freedom is far from God. Nobody is truly free. God commanded that man would toil and serve all his days but what you serve must be good, and what you toil for must also be good. A family is good. To serve your family is to serve God. To serve a nation that keeps its faith with God, is to serve God.
The subversion within our nation is sickening. Not only is it sick that American politicians, and media say that American families must not have children because of "overpopulation," but also because of the lie that is man made climate change. It is not even majorly the fault of the U.S. that pollution occurs at such high levels. 90% of the oceans plastic pollution comes from outside the U.S.. The media, politicians, and scientists are lying to you. These satanists want you to believe them. These satanists want you to have loyalty only to the state and its words.
These categories, in order, are:
- God - faith
- Family - loyalty
- Nation - union
God - faith
God is truth. All things come from Him. The reason the world is chaotic -- barring original sin -- is because humanity's faith in God has been perverted, distorted, or rejected entirely. You do not need religion to have faith. Simply by studying the Bible, you can become closer to God. But, to truly become one with God, you need to go through Jesus who saved us from sin - again, you do not need to be an official Christian to know God, or Jesus. To be forgiven for sin, you must go through Jesus.This is because sin requires blood. By blood sin is performed, and by blood sin is atoned. "The wages of sin is death." That meaning in plain English: the payment for sin IS death - in other words, you purchase forgiveness with sinless blood as currency. This is the reason for all those sacrifices in the Old Testament, and the final sacrifice in the New Testament. God requires that we pay for our sins with the blood of pure (sinless) living beings -- people sacrificed by people do not count, as that sacrifice would be murder, and "innocent" children are born with the original sin through the fathers semen and the mothers egg, thus they are not pure. This is why God sent the ultimate sacrifice. That being Jesus, who was immaculately conceived and was a pure (sinless) man.
But what of the woman's sin? Did Mary not taint Jesus? Women are also born with original sin in their blood. The reason Jesus was pure, despite being born of a sinful woman, was because Mary had an immaculate conception, i.e. she did not have intercourse, and her own egg was not used. God simply used her virgin body to nurture the baby Jesus to life. Thus Jesus was grown in the womb of a sinful woman and provided nutrients through the Lords sinless foods - of Earths creations, only man & woman have sin. The curious may wonder, "well couldn't the womb contaminate Jesus?" No. No blood, nor tissue, nor any sorts of sin carrying DNA are passed from mother to child (it can be passed from child to mother) thus Jesus avoided mans original sin, and was born pure - and remember, Mary's egg was not used, nor was a man's semen. So, there was no DNA transfer in that way either. Besides, God created the entire universe and all its contents. Is it not at least possible that God could have prevented Jesus from being tainted while in the womb?
If you desire to know the truth, then you MUST study the Bible. End of story. If you did not grow up learning about Jesus, then start with the New Testament. If you did, then feel free to start with the Old Testament.
Family - loyalty
Family is the basis for mankind's continued existence. God said, "be fruitful and multiply." It is the duty of every man, and every woman to follow that command. However, that does not mean it is a sin if you do not have children through no fault of your own - being barren, or impotent. If you can have children, then you must. But, if you willingly pervert conception through either sodomy, unnatural birth control, or abortion. You are committing a sin.When a nation forgoes its own families, everything crumbles. This is the reason that the media is pushing for American families to not have children, and instead to work. With excuses such as: "you can't afford it; you're not ready yet; look how much money you could save; think of the Earth; you're contributing to overpopulation." All the while, our government brings in incompatible foreigners from countries that have more than four times the population of the U.S.. This is done to reduce the population of people with faith in God.
For thousands of years, mankind formed families, and had children. People with a hundred times less than what we have now, yet they still had children. People in poor nations - yes, like the one's you see on a t.v. commercial, think about for two seconds, then switch to the E! channel or some other Modernite distraction - are still having children despite extreme hardship. Are you really going to sit there and say that you can't have children because of... reasons? Get real.
You can have children if you really want to. A family, and especially children, will motivate you even further. You will work harder than you ever have, and you will be happier than you ever have - so long as you remain loyal to your family, and loyal to your faith in God.
Hopefully, now you can see the reasons for why some nations and people try to convince others to not start families, and not have children. Those people, organizations, institutions, and governments are satanists. Satanists wish to defy God in all things, and have loyalty only to themselves and their sinful desires. They may not know what it is they do, but so long as a person does not follow God, they are carrying out the will of Satan. Satan is the root of all evil.
Nation - union
A union of peoples create a nation. A nation of peoples with
loyalty to their families sustain the nation. Families with faith in God
prosper the nation. God, family, nation.The state wants people to believe that freedom of choice is good. It can be. But, absolute freedom IS satanism. Worship of the self, worship of technology, worship of money, do whatever feels good, have sex with who you want, perform sodomy, don't have a family, get that abortion; all those things are satanism. Also, absolute freedom of choice will never be permitted. Not by God, and not by Satan, or those who serve Satan. However, Satan and his ilk will try to convince you that they do allow for absolute freedom - they don't.
To be a satanist, one does not need to join an official satanist cult/religion. All one needs to do is worship false idols, and have loyalty to mankind's works. Freedom is good. However, absolute freedom is far from God. Nobody is truly free. God commanded that man would toil and serve all his days but what you serve must be good, and what you toil for must also be good. A family is good. To serve your family is to serve God. To serve a nation that keeps its faith with God, is to serve God.
The subversion within our nation is sickening. Not only is it sick that American politicians, and media say that American families must not have children because of "overpopulation," but also because of the lie that is man made climate change. It is not even majorly the fault of the U.S. that pollution occurs at such high levels. 90% of the oceans plastic pollution comes from outside the U.S.. The media, politicians, and scientists are lying to you. These satanists want you to believe them. These satanists want you to have loyalty only to the state and its words.
Forget God. Forget
family. Forget a nation. No borders, no nation. Ring a bell? A
modern Neo Babylon is the final goal. One culture. One people. One language.
Satan wishes to be the one.
I hope this helped you see the truth hidden before your eyes. Or at least, will motivate you to seek it out.
I hope this helped you see the truth hidden before your eyes. Or at least, will motivate you to seek it out.
19 March 2019
The Dillusion that is Multiculturalism
Many a Modernite believes that the future will be multicultural. That goal is in no way possible, or true. When cultures clash or come together, only one can survive. This truth is evident throughout history, and has never wavered.
The curriculum of a Modernite institution or organization, often proclaims "diversity" as a goal, and even a virtue. Can the people who believe in such things not see the absurdity of proclaiming variance in people and culture as a strength? How does that make sense? For example: A company has on staff, 10 Africans, 10 Anglos, and 10 Asians, and half are gay. Modernites would thus claim diversity makes them strong. What is this strength?
In what dodo brained mind does the makeup of different peoples indicate an organizations ability to produce, or be effective? By having different races of people of different orientations, and different creeds, what has been improved? The answer is nothing.
Nothing has been improved. You now have a lot of people who cannot relate to one another because they are so uniquely different. Diversity and multiculturalism are not strengths. In bringing people together, you eliminate what was unique. It is nothing to be praised or touted as the way of the future. That future will prove only to eliminate all cultures but the singular strongest one. It is only ever possible for one culture to flourish when brought together. This is literal text book natural selection.
Natural selection, evolution, Darwin. The science the left loves. If the left can't even subscribe to their own heroes, their own science. What do they have? The answer is nothing. The left doesn't have God. The left doesn't have families. The left doesn't even have true morals. The left is nothing more than a group of people that are pawns to emotions pulled like puppet strings by their media masters, and the further, the masters of the media.
Look at the ancient city of Babylon. Everybody spoke one language, and practiced one culture. Despite that the city's peoples were diverse and from many different cultures, there was only the singular culture. The culture of this city was so strong, that outsiders were forced to adapt to its practices and traditions -- its culture.
Look at the Ainu people of Japan. The Ainu were a people with their own culture that clashed with the Japanese. Of course, as is 100% verifiable, historically accurate, factual, and true, the Ainu culture was conquered and eliminated; its people were assimilated. Only one culture survives. However, the people still exist. There are about 200 thousand in Japan. So, you could say that the Japanese people are now more diverse because of the Ainu. However, I challenge you to identify which person is Ainu, and which person is Japanese in a crowd.
Assimilate, conquer, or die. Those are the only truths in this world. The only inevitable outcome of multiculturalism.
The curriculum of a Modernite institution or organization, often proclaims "diversity" as a goal, and even a virtue. Can the people who believe in such things not see the absurdity of proclaiming variance in people and culture as a strength? How does that make sense? For example: A company has on staff, 10 Africans, 10 Anglos, and 10 Asians, and half are gay. Modernites would thus claim diversity makes them strong. What is this strength?
In what dodo brained mind does the makeup of different peoples indicate an organizations ability to produce, or be effective? By having different races of people of different orientations, and different creeds, what has been improved? The answer is nothing.
Nothing has been improved. You now have a lot of people who cannot relate to one another because they are so uniquely different. Diversity and multiculturalism are not strengths. In bringing people together, you eliminate what was unique. It is nothing to be praised or touted as the way of the future. That future will prove only to eliminate all cultures but the singular strongest one. It is only ever possible for one culture to flourish when brought together. This is literal text book natural selection.
Natural selection, evolution, Darwin. The science the left loves. If the left can't even subscribe to their own heroes, their own science. What do they have? The answer is nothing. The left doesn't have God. The left doesn't have families. The left doesn't even have true morals. The left is nothing more than a group of people that are pawns to emotions pulled like puppet strings by their media masters, and the further, the masters of the media.
Look at the ancient city of Babylon. Everybody spoke one language, and practiced one culture. Despite that the city's peoples were diverse and from many different cultures, there was only the singular culture. The culture of this city was so strong, that outsiders were forced to adapt to its practices and traditions -- its culture.
Look at the Ainu people of Japan. The Ainu were a people with their own culture that clashed with the Japanese. Of course, as is 100% verifiable, historically accurate, factual, and true, the Ainu culture was conquered and eliminated; its people were assimilated. Only one culture survives. However, the people still exist. There are about 200 thousand in Japan. So, you could say that the Japanese people are now more diverse because of the Ainu. However, I challenge you to identify which person is Ainu, and which person is Japanese in a crowd.
Assimilate, conquer, or die. Those are the only truths in this world. The only inevitable outcome of multiculturalism.
18 March 2019
The Sanctity of Life
It is time for me to address the abortion debate. I will not apply religion in my argument. I will not even plainly say for what side I am arguing. If you stick with it, I can guarantee that you will be one step closer to the truth. First, I'll cover some basics.
If a woman becomes pregnant and waits around 9 months, she will give birth to a human child. Now, if that pregnancy is interrupted, either naturally or unnaturally, that clump of cells, embryo, unborn child, whatever you want to call it, that thing will die. Its bonds will break apart, and it will rot if not burned or preserved.
If the pregnancy process is naturally interrupted, then the process will have been ended forcefully, but not deliberately. If the pregnancy process is unnaturally interrupted, then the process will have been ended deliberately, and forcefully. Without any unnatural, or natural interference, that pregnancy will develop into a fully functioning human child. Can we agree on that?
Now begins the argument.
Take a vacation to Hawaii during a time when endangered turtles are growing in their eggs. Now crush one of those eggs under your foot. Can we agree that this would be the wrong thing to do? In crushing that egg, you will be fined and possibly jailed. After all, you did just crush the egg of an endangered turtle.
Is the total population of a species the only defining factor as to what makes the killing of unborn and underdeveloped offspring wrong? Turtles: endangered; killing the fertilized turtle egg is punishable, and some may dislike you for it. Humans: not endangered; killing the fertilized human egg is not punishable, but some may dislike you for it. Now bear with me. Abort an unborn turtle - unacceptable, bad. Abort an unborn human - acceptable, good.
Now hold on, it is possible that someone may believe that just because someone thinks that it is acceptable to abort the pregnancy, doesn't mean they think it is good. So, a person may think the idea of something as a whole is bad, but there are times when the occurrence is acceptable. A person must then realize that the very act of willingly doing something, even just in that instance, means that you've found that thing to which you are doing, to be acceptable in that specific instance. In effect, that was the good choice to make at the time.
Someone might say that they are against stealing. Now, this may be true with regards to something like a candy bar, or wallet, or car. But, as soon as something of a certain value can be stolen without consequence, that person may be much more inclined to take it. What also matters is who a person is stealing from.
When confronted with taking something from say, a billionaire. Most could probably agree that taking one thousand dollars would not affect that billionaire in any negative way. The person who takes that money might think that the billionaire already has enough, and that they need it more. This is most likely the truth. That billionaire really wouldn't be affected by that missing one thousand dollars, and the person who stole it probably does need it more. By that action, they have just set their acceptable limit for stealing.
Now apply that reasoning to a killing, or murder. What is the acceptable limit? What is less outrageous? More outrageous? Who's death is more or less acceptable? Evaluate the below questions, and decide.
Would the killing of a man that rapes both women and children be relieving, or devastating? Would the killing of an on-duty police officer be trivial, or outstanding? That officer did know the risks associated with the job. How about a soldier at war? They knew the risks, right? What about a draftee? Is their death more or less acceptable than the volunteer? What about a hospital nurse murdering 17 children in their cribs? Would that be troublesome to the mind? How about the wholesale slaughter of 15,000 baby cows for the meat industry? The crushing of an egg belonging to an endangered animal? Crushing the egg of a chicken? Killing a newborn because it is disabled?
Have you weighed and measured the morality of it all? Have you determined your acceptable limits, for what constitutes an acceptable death? Did you find yourself thinking that there just might be some gray area in certain choices, and not in others? Could you not decide on some? Do you realize that the "gray area" is simply ones own inability to choose? Do you realize that by not choosing you are allowing others and nature to make the choice for you?
Apply this determination to a single unborn human child. A human fetus. A human embryo. A fertilized human egg. Is this killing acceptable or unacceptable? Is it good, or is it bad? What is your limit for what constitutes an acceptable killing?
Choose.
If a woman becomes pregnant and waits around 9 months, she will give birth to a human child. Now, if that pregnancy is interrupted, either naturally or unnaturally, that clump of cells, embryo, unborn child, whatever you want to call it, that thing will die. Its bonds will break apart, and it will rot if not burned or preserved.
If the pregnancy process is naturally interrupted, then the process will have been ended forcefully, but not deliberately. If the pregnancy process is unnaturally interrupted, then the process will have been ended deliberately, and forcefully. Without any unnatural, or natural interference, that pregnancy will develop into a fully functioning human child. Can we agree on that?
Now begins the argument.
Take a vacation to Hawaii during a time when endangered turtles are growing in their eggs. Now crush one of those eggs under your foot. Can we agree that this would be the wrong thing to do? In crushing that egg, you will be fined and possibly jailed. After all, you did just crush the egg of an endangered turtle.
Is the total population of a species the only defining factor as to what makes the killing of unborn and underdeveloped offspring wrong? Turtles: endangered; killing the fertilized turtle egg is punishable, and some may dislike you for it. Humans: not endangered; killing the fertilized human egg is not punishable, but some may dislike you for it. Now bear with me. Abort an unborn turtle - unacceptable, bad. Abort an unborn human - acceptable, good.
Now hold on, it is possible that someone may believe that just because someone thinks that it is acceptable to abort the pregnancy, doesn't mean they think it is good. So, a person may think the idea of something as a whole is bad, but there are times when the occurrence is acceptable. A person must then realize that the very act of willingly doing something, even just in that instance, means that you've found that thing to which you are doing, to be acceptable in that specific instance. In effect, that was the good choice to make at the time.
Someone might say that they are against stealing. Now, this may be true with regards to something like a candy bar, or wallet, or car. But, as soon as something of a certain value can be stolen without consequence, that person may be much more inclined to take it. What also matters is who a person is stealing from.
When confronted with taking something from say, a billionaire. Most could probably agree that taking one thousand dollars would not affect that billionaire in any negative way. The person who takes that money might think that the billionaire already has enough, and that they need it more. This is most likely the truth. That billionaire really wouldn't be affected by that missing one thousand dollars, and the person who stole it probably does need it more. By that action, they have just set their acceptable limit for stealing.
Now apply that reasoning to a killing, or murder. What is the acceptable limit? What is less outrageous? More outrageous? Who's death is more or less acceptable? Evaluate the below questions, and decide.
Would the killing of a man that rapes both women and children be relieving, or devastating? Would the killing of an on-duty police officer be trivial, or outstanding? That officer did know the risks associated with the job. How about a soldier at war? They knew the risks, right? What about a draftee? Is their death more or less acceptable than the volunteer? What about a hospital nurse murdering 17 children in their cribs? Would that be troublesome to the mind? How about the wholesale slaughter of 15,000 baby cows for the meat industry? The crushing of an egg belonging to an endangered animal? Crushing the egg of a chicken? Killing a newborn because it is disabled?
Have you weighed and measured the morality of it all? Have you determined your acceptable limits, for what constitutes an acceptable death? Did you find yourself thinking that there just might be some gray area in certain choices, and not in others? Could you not decide on some? Do you realize that the "gray area" is simply ones own inability to choose? Do you realize that by not choosing you are allowing others and nature to make the choice for you?
Apply this determination to a single unborn human child. A human fetus. A human embryo. A fertilized human egg. Is this killing acceptable or unacceptable? Is it good, or is it bad? What is your limit for what constitutes an acceptable killing?
Choose.
Different Forms of Liberalism, and Conservatism
Isn't it interesting that often times, conservatives are at war with one another? This isn't to say that liberals don't end up eating themselves -- many are, after all, manic depressive. But, there seems to be something preventing conservatives working together that just doesn't seem present among liberals.
This thing which keeps conservatives from completely agreeing with one another is called morals. Take for example 45's emergency declaration. Liberals unequivocally opposed it. On account of that, one would think the smart thing to do on the conservative side would be to unanimously support the effort. However, that wasn't the case.
Half a dozen, or so, congressmen decided not to support the emergency declaration. Those members, along with all the democrats, are traitors to the nation. The reasons for their opposition was however, different. While the democrat will vehemently oppose 45, the conservative does it because they believe that the declaration violates the constitution. Whether it does or does not, is at this point entirely moot. Our constitution is already trampled, and will only continue to become more worthless as more and more people continue to support the idea of a "democracy."
The moral-less liberals are all too aware of the fact that they must unanimously band together in order to subvert the nation. Conservatives will never do this to save it because they do have morals. These conservatives need to realize that the constitution is already so far from what it was originally, that if they don't get together and find their own ways to skirt it, then it can never be restored.
The problem with modern conservatives is that they are too concerned with their morals. The conservative congressman that thinks, "well, I'd oppose it if it were Obama, so I must oppose it even if it's Trump," is a fool. This nation is long past a place where congressmen could truly vote in the direction that best suited their moral platitudes. Our nation is now owned and influenced by foreign nations, bad Jews, bad Catholics, China, Banks, and satanists as a whole.
With the state of our Republic holding on by a thread -- and only so because 45 is prolonging the inevitable -- it is time for all conservatives to unite under one common banner.
God. Constitution. Country.
If that is not done -- it won't be -- then this Republic is fallen. The end game is around the corner, folks. Prepare accordingly.
This thing which keeps conservatives from completely agreeing with one another is called morals. Take for example 45's emergency declaration. Liberals unequivocally opposed it. On account of that, one would think the smart thing to do on the conservative side would be to unanimously support the effort. However, that wasn't the case.
Half a dozen, or so, congressmen decided not to support the emergency declaration. Those members, along with all the democrats, are traitors to the nation. The reasons for their opposition was however, different. While the democrat will vehemently oppose 45, the conservative does it because they believe that the declaration violates the constitution. Whether it does or does not, is at this point entirely moot. Our constitution is already trampled, and will only continue to become more worthless as more and more people continue to support the idea of a "democracy."
The moral-less liberals are all too aware of the fact that they must unanimously band together in order to subvert the nation. Conservatives will never do this to save it because they do have morals. These conservatives need to realize that the constitution is already so far from what it was originally, that if they don't get together and find their own ways to skirt it, then it can never be restored.
The problem with modern conservatives is that they are too concerned with their morals. The conservative congressman that thinks, "well, I'd oppose it if it were Obama, so I must oppose it even if it's Trump," is a fool. This nation is long past a place where congressmen could truly vote in the direction that best suited their moral platitudes. Our nation is now owned and influenced by foreign nations, bad Jews, bad Catholics, China, Banks, and satanists as a whole.
With the state of our Republic holding on by a thread -- and only so because 45 is prolonging the inevitable -- it is time for all conservatives to unite under one common banner.
God. Constitution. Country.
If that is not done -- it won't be -- then this Republic is fallen. The end game is around the corner, folks. Prepare accordingly.
17 March 2019
Is Generation Z Really Conservative?
There has been a rumor running around for some time, that even I found myself to have been propagating. This rumor being that Gen Z is supposedly the most conservative generation since the time of WWII. I found myself reiterating the rumor because of verifiable evidence of study after study, which claimed that Gen Z didn't like tattoos, smoking, alcohol, meaningless sex, and many other things which liberals are partial to.
But, now I find myself not seeing the upcoming Gen Z as the savior of western society. No. Now I see Gen Z as being the generation that will hammer in the final nail of the coffin that is the U.S..
I've come to this conclusion because of the advents of extreme dark humor in today's youth. From music, to memeology. The darker the content, the better. Suicide? Funny. Caring for others? Cringy and weird. Children? Not worth the time. "Fur babies?" The ultimate child. So yes, Gen Z may not like tattoos, or alcohol, or sleeping around. But, not liking those things does not correlate directly to a society that will become conservative. Many Gen Z'ers find themselves aligning with politicians like Bernie Sanders, AOC, and even wish to support the Green New Deal.
Ask yourself, "why else would House Democrats support lowering the voting age to 16?" The answer is that they know that in doing so, Democrats will gain tens of thousands, if not millions, of more votes. Children are extremely susceptible to media influence. Every child coast to coast owns a cell phone with access to Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and twitter. Media companies are targeting these kids with false information.
Gen Z will not save the U.S. and it is already too late to turn things around. Do not despair! Now is the time to get self sufficient. Get connected to people, and communities of a like-mind. This country will fall. However, that does not mean a new and better country cannot rise from the ashes.
But, now I find myself not seeing the upcoming Gen Z as the savior of western society. No. Now I see Gen Z as being the generation that will hammer in the final nail of the coffin that is the U.S..
I've come to this conclusion because of the advents of extreme dark humor in today's youth. From music, to memeology. The darker the content, the better. Suicide? Funny. Caring for others? Cringy and weird. Children? Not worth the time. "Fur babies?" The ultimate child. So yes, Gen Z may not like tattoos, or alcohol, or sleeping around. But, not liking those things does not correlate directly to a society that will become conservative. Many Gen Z'ers find themselves aligning with politicians like Bernie Sanders, AOC, and even wish to support the Green New Deal.
Ask yourself, "why else would House Democrats support lowering the voting age to 16?" The answer is that they know that in doing so, Democrats will gain tens of thousands, if not millions, of more votes. Children are extremely susceptible to media influence. Every child coast to coast owns a cell phone with access to Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and twitter. Media companies are targeting these kids with false information.
Gen Z will not save the U.S. and it is already too late to turn things around. Do not despair! Now is the time to get self sufficient. Get connected to people, and communities of a like-mind. This country will fall. However, that does not mean a new and better country cannot rise from the ashes.
16 March 2019
The De-Humanization of the University
The modern university is a farce, a sham... a joke. The modern university is no longer a place where an individual can acquire the skills necessary to blossom within a society bordered by common law; for that common law has been eliminated and spread among multitudes of different peoples. The modern university no longer fosters the spirit of ingenuity, creativity, or growth. Instead, the modern university demands obedience to a set of structured rules and regulations. This is the experience of an Orphic Soldier.
Now, before I began attending "higher education" -- as some people call it -- I already had a profound lack of respect for it. My direct experience of it has only served to prove my prior evaluation as correct. This prior assumption being the belief that modern universities cannot teach anything of concrete value, and only serve as stepping stones to bigger and better institutions by way of the o so coveted scrap of paper.
This is not to say that universities have always been this useless. The university of old was a place where people went to learn, to debate, to argue. This is no longer so. In fact, the one who tries to argue is often met by so much resounding opposition, that the dissenting opinion itself has just served to ostracize the speaker. The very term "argument" has been so skewed and butchered, that to mention the word is to commit a great offense.
The institution no longer wants to hear its students own arguments, but instead wishes to hear that of a piecemeal side dish "discussion," paired with the main course of a "peer reviewed" paper. Yes. Universities no longer wish to foster the spirit that all men are created equal, that all sound arguments should be taken seriously.
No, the only argument that matters is one that argues little. Instead of the argument supporting itself, it should be supported by the words of a filtered and peer reviewed paper. A paper that has been soaked and wrung in the juices of a culture so worried about not offending, and fitting the narrative that it actively suppresses itself by way of demonizing the arguments and opinions of those who care the most.
In the modern university, your opinion doesn't matter. Your argument doesn't matter. In the modern university, what you think is not as important as those who have been "peer reviewed," as if that means anything. The modern university is conditioning people to not think for themselves, but to instead look to other peoples opinions, then base their own discussion around that. After all, if you aren't making your own arguments, then it really is the mere discussion of another's own.
Ultimately, this all amounts to dehumanizing the individual and their spark of creativity, or desire for creation. By supposing that a students argument caries no weight unless they build it around another's own, students are coerced into believing that they themselves cannot come up with concrete and valid concepts, and must instead look to the institutions for the answers. This is sickening.
You are a human. You can intrinsically make value. Your arguments can hold true by themselves. Believe in that.
Now, before I began attending "higher education" -- as some people call it -- I already had a profound lack of respect for it. My direct experience of it has only served to prove my prior evaluation as correct. This prior assumption being the belief that modern universities cannot teach anything of concrete value, and only serve as stepping stones to bigger and better institutions by way of the o so coveted scrap of paper.
This is not to say that universities have always been this useless. The university of old was a place where people went to learn, to debate, to argue. This is no longer so. In fact, the one who tries to argue is often met by so much resounding opposition, that the dissenting opinion itself has just served to ostracize the speaker. The very term "argument" has been so skewed and butchered, that to mention the word is to commit a great offense.
The institution no longer wants to hear its students own arguments, but instead wishes to hear that of a piecemeal side dish "discussion," paired with the main course of a "peer reviewed" paper. Yes. Universities no longer wish to foster the spirit that all men are created equal, that all sound arguments should be taken seriously.
No, the only argument that matters is one that argues little. Instead of the argument supporting itself, it should be supported by the words of a filtered and peer reviewed paper. A paper that has been soaked and wrung in the juices of a culture so worried about not offending, and fitting the narrative that it actively suppresses itself by way of demonizing the arguments and opinions of those who care the most.
In the modern university, your opinion doesn't matter. Your argument doesn't matter. In the modern university, what you think is not as important as those who have been "peer reviewed," as if that means anything. The modern university is conditioning people to not think for themselves, but to instead look to other peoples opinions, then base their own discussion around that. After all, if you aren't making your own arguments, then it really is the mere discussion of another's own.
Ultimately, this all amounts to dehumanizing the individual and their spark of creativity, or desire for creation. By supposing that a students argument caries no weight unless they build it around another's own, students are coerced into believing that they themselves cannot come up with concrete and valid concepts, and must instead look to the institutions for the answers. This is sickening.
You are a human. You can intrinsically make value. Your arguments can hold true by themselves. Believe in that.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)