No matter how one looks at it, based on all available evidence, the United States of America was founded only for the British Christian people - yes, I and many other "whites" are not British, and even more are not Christian, and thus don't fit in with what the Founders intended; though we are closer than any African, Mexican, Asian, or whatever else that's not European.
Some people want to say the USA as an entity belongs to the "Native Americans," and some say it belongs to the Africans because they "built it." Yet, it was these formerly British Founding Men who organized the whole thing. Whether it was through conquest, slavery (and every people and culture is mired in buying and selling slaves), trickery, or whatever - this is what we're left with. Today, the "it belongs to X" argument is pointless outside of what the history says; and today using history as a point of order is even more pointless, as all peoples and culture are already here, and the whole thing is dying.
The "melting pot" is a cancer to any society in which it takes place (barring Babylon, but we saw that culture-wide hubris was the result which prompted a certain response). This is because when dropping multitudes of cultures and peoples into a proverbial stew pot, each diverse, unique culture and people is wiped out in the formation of some mutation of them all. Does anybody really want that? For example: Let's say we just force the Japanese and the Germans into one border and call it diversity! Bye bye October fest, see you later animator!
My joking aside, for all we know Free Masons could have once been an organization of masons who worked for free. Just as with what happened with the USA and history itself, there are those who desire to subvert anything which stands for the betterment of any people, altering the purposes while keeping the name.
I for one think the USA should die, as it was already lost with the ratifying of the 13th Amendment. However, I still stand for Truth, and according to all the digging I've done, the Founding Men did intend that the USA should be for European (specifically British) Christians only. Further, it was to be lead only by men - a massive mistake on the Founder's part (among many others, yes, I think slavery was a mistake in more ways than one) was not being more specific in regard to the presiding culture, but in the times it was a commonly understood truth that men are leaders, and women are not.
Further, I must also address the Christian aspect, as I consider myself one of the few True Christians on this flat Earth plane of existence which God created for man.
Christianity is more "hardcore" than most people realize. Jesus Christ was a very, very tough man, and extremely strict. If you look at the Covenant between God and Moses, you will see that God gave Moses the authority to make certain laws of his own - such as stoning people to death for breaking the Sabbath, that was all Moses' authority. Under the New Covenant, which places all Christians under the authority of Christ, we can see that all men are equal, we should treat our neighbors as we would want to be treated, and we should turn the other cheek but, we don't have to. Under the New Covenant there is both more liberty and restriction. We are restricted now by our mere thoughts: You see a pretty woman and think of her lustfully? You've just sinned. That was not so under Mosaic Law, called the Old Covenant. As for liberty: food restrictions were removed, and "Everything is permissible, but not all things are beneficial" (
1 Corinthians 10:23).
What all this means is: You want to be a slave owner (funny enough, the Bible tells slaves to be good slaves, as if they were serving God Himself - the slavemasters are also to treat slaves very kindly)? Go ahead. You want to murder? Go ahead. You want to do "X" evil thing? Go ahead. God shall repay, for "vengeance is the Lord's," and "You reap what you sow." And see also Christ saying that those who kill by the sword will die by the sword - but ask yourself, did Christ say: "You can't have a weapon or kill in self-defense, or other such situations."
In the New Covenant the sins of the father no longer pass to the children, all men are now accountable for their own actions. If a person wants to prefer their own people over another, they have that right. If a person wants to be a "racist," they have that right. If what they do is wrong in God's eyes (a sin), then they will be judged for it accordingly. In fact, "in the manner that you judge, so too shall you be judged." Remember sinning in thought? If you hate and wish harm on a man, who is made in God's image, for saying he dislikes a different group of people, then you've just committed a sin.
Now, until someone shows me in the Bible, or anywhere in all Scripture, that I, or anybody, doesn't have the right to their own homogeneous people, culture, society, and nation (or even personal preference itself), then I'm still going to prefer English-speaking, Christian European-descended peoples and cultures. And anybody who tells people they should feel guilty for "X" is they themselves guilty of judging in a manner for which they are not given authority to judge.
